The R&D tax credit landscape is constantly evolving, and recent court cases continue to shape how companies must approach their claims. If your company relies on R&D tax credits, these cases highlight the biggest risks, compliance pitfalls, and IRS scrutiny trends you need to be aware of.
Case #1: The IRS Is Taking a Stricter Stance on the Process of Experimentation
Little Sandy Coal Co., Inc. v. Commissioner (2021)
What Happened? The Tax Court denied significant R&D tax credits because the company failed to prove that at least 80% of their research followed a structured process of experimentation.
Key Takeaway: The IRS wants detailed documentation showing how companies conduct experiments, make iterative improvements, and resolve scientific uncertainty.
Best Practice: Maintain real-time documentation, including design iterations, test results, and engineering notes, to demonstrate a structured experimental process.
Case #2: The IRS Is Narrowing What Qualifies as Uncertainty
Phoenix Design Group, Inc. v. Commissioner (2024)
What Happened? The Tax Court ruled that a taxpayer failed to identify specific uncertainties before beginning their research, disqualifying their claim.
Key Takeaway: The IRS now expects clear documentation of technological uncertainty at the outset of a project—not just general uncertainty about design challenges.
Best Practice: Define the scientific or technological questions your research seeks to answer before beginning development.
Case #3: Refund Claims Face Higher Scrutiny Than Ever
Meyer, Borgman & Johnson, Inc. v. Commissioner (2024)
What Happened? The IRS used the new Classifier review system to deny an R&D tax credit refund claim before it even reached an examiner.
Key Takeaway: Refund claims must be bulletproof before submission. A weak claim may not even make it past the initial IRS gatekeeper.
Best Practice: Before filing a refund claim, ensure you can provide:
- A clear breakdown of business components
- Detailed documentation linking expenses to research activities
- A strong narrative explaining the process of experimentation
Final Thoughts: How to Stay Ahead of R&D Tax Compliance in 2025
The IRS is cracking down on vague claims and requiring higher levels of documentation than ever before. Companies must:
- Ensure they follow a structured process of experimentation
- Clearly define technological uncertainty at the outset
- Strengthen refund claims to withstand initial IRS review
Need expert guidance? MASSIE’s R&D tax specialists and Morgan Lewis’s legal experts can help you stay compliant and maximize your claims.